Agreement Markers

We will start the discussion with the simplest scenario: if the soil is a lexical nostun and there is no chord marker in the chain, as in (46). Once the structure of these examples is available, we will return to more complex cases such as (45). At the beginning of modern times, there was an agreement for the second person, which singularus all the verbs in the current form, as well as in the past some usual verbs. It was usually in the shape-east, but -st and t also occurred. Note that this does not affect endings for other people and numbers. Among the two types of owners, the owner of the dative may also appear separate from the possessum. If the owner of the external dative is a pluralistic lexical noun, then the possessum can show the singular of plural agreement. Footnote 12 Innovative work on Turkish syntax in general, this document contains some of the first detailed formal analyses of the agreement in the nominal area. The agreement generally includes the matching of the value of a grammatical category between different elements of a sentence (or sometimes between sentences, as in some cases where a pronoun agrees with its predecessor or its reference opinion). Some categories that often trigger grammatical chords are listed below. Fall markers and case-like ps are housed in the place and path heads.

AxPrt, short for „Axial Part,“ is a function head with rated properties. An agreement on oblique pronouns is created because AxPrt is equipped with uninterpretable characteristics of numbers and people that are verified with the Ground DP, the complement to AxPrt. In most cases, AxPrt merges into Hungarian with another node in the morphological component, so that no separate vocal elements are inserted under AxPrt. This is displayed by the ∅ icon. The structure of pronouns with oblique fall markers is represented in (76b) (pronouns with a case-like P and lexical subxical with oblique or ps case-shaped cases also this structure).) In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person).