At the beginning of the 20th century, divorce cases became more frequent, and controversial custody became a subject that concerned many families. With the changes in attitudes of the 1920s, a woman`s sexual behaviour no longer prevented her from obtaining custody of her children. Double standards in the sexual behaviour of fathers and mothers have been abolished. Keezer`s new rule on the Marriage and Divorce Act states: „Where children are tender years, other things are equal, the mother is privileged as a babysitter, especially in the case of female children, even though she has been guilty of delinquens in the past, but there is no evidence that she was guilty of the case by the court at the time of the decision.“  In an economic analysis, Imran Rasul concluded that if one parent values the quality of the child more than the other, the spouses prefer that the parent have sole custody, while shared custody is optimal for parents with a relatively equal assessment of the child`s quality. He also concluded that „if divorce costs decrease, shared custody is rather optimal, so that children stay in touch with both parents“ and that „this can improve the best interests of the child.“  Determining custody and opportunities for children to visit is a very complex process. Many factors can be verified, including the background and skills of the parents, the context of the child and other elements. All custody and visitation arrangements are in the best interests of the child. In some states, joint physical custody creates a presumption of equal shared education, but in most states, shared physical custody creates an obligation to provide each parent with „significant periods“ of physical custody to ensure „frequent and permanent contact“ with both parents.  For example, U.S. states such as Alabama, California and Texas do not necessarily require joint child care orders to result in a substantially identical period of education, while states such as Arizona, Georgia and Louisiana require joint custody orders to result, as far as possible, in a period of substantially identical education.  Courts have not clearly defined what „significant periods“ and „frequent and continuous contact“ mean by parents to seek justice.
Second, if there is a controversy or disagreement over the terms of custody and visitation, you should request an amendment to the child`s custody or visitation by-law. This can help prevent situations where one or two parents are trying to take matters into their own hands and are trying to create new regulations. All amendments must first be approved by the court before being implemented. In the event of divorce or separation, as well as in other situations, each parent may have different rights to their child or children. In most cases, each parent has the right to give consent for custody of the children and visits to the orphanage. These are two family law issues that are distinct and distinct, but interact very closely. When parents do not live together, their most difficult and serious disagreements often affect their children. It is generally preferable, for both parents and children, for parents to be able to agree on custody and visitation without involving lawyers and the courts.
It is important for parents to remember that their problems are not their children`s fault. When trying to resolve a disagreement over child care, the most important thing parents should keep in mind is the well-being of the children.